Monday, September 23, 2013

Scientific Method


 

            There are four steps to the scientific method. They are;

1.      Observation of phenomenon.

2.      Formulation of a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon.

3.      Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena.

4.      Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

I interviewed two scientists and asked them if they use the scientific method. I asked Dr. Wendy Burns and Dr. Joseph Sinski.

      Dr. Burns said she does not use the scientific method as taught but a version of it. She gets her ideas by reading scientific research or talking with other scientists. After she gets an idea of what she wants to research, she looks at the scientific research and sees what other people have done. That prevents her from copying someone else’s research. She also used the scientific research to find out what type of experiments people are doing and how they interpret the results. Then she does experiments on her specific topics.

      Dr. Sinski does use the scientific method. He says it is like common sense for him. If he starts a new project, he looks for anything interesting he can find out about a system. Then he thinks about what is interesting in the thing or situation. Then he starts to take what he finds interesting about the thing or situation and tries to propose a reason the interesting thing or situation is so. Then he plans to test the interesting thing or situation. Depending on his results, he either does more experiments to show how he proved his guess about the interesting thing or subject.

      I was surprised to find that Dr. Burns doesn’t use the exact scientific method. If I do more research and interviews, I may find that more people are like her and do not use it. It is surprising to me because I was taught that this is how all scientists to their experiments.

Reference: "Introduction to the Scientific Method." Home Page of F. L. H. Wolfs. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Sept. 2013. <http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Blog 1: "Welcome to the Age of Denial"


            While reading Welcome to the Age of Denial by Adam Frank found here, I asked myself how do you expect someone to like your article when you dis them. At the very beginning of his article he gave the readers a statistic on creationists. The statistic showed that the number had increased from 1982 to 2012. I wondered why he had choose this statistic as his opening paragraph for a science article. Obviously he is going to have some bias in this piece. Such as when he called the creationists silly.

            So I read on and I was not attached at all to the article. He was being a drama queen, acting like no one pays attention to science anymore.  When something important in science happens, people notice, he was saying that no one celebrates science anymore, when they do. Science just isn’t something average people talk about on a daily basis, and neither is Geometry, I don’t see the big deal he’s trying to make.

            Students going through school still have to take science classes. Some people like science and some others do not. Students are still learning about science and how it contributes to society. People do still pay attention to what is going on in the world, which often times, involves science. I do not think we should be worried about science not being important anymore because it is. It is just not as popular as it was when it was up and coming. I do not think anything needs to be done to protect science, because it is not going away.